There was no gradual strip of souls. They died flat out during biotransferrence. Their minds were limited to what chassis they were strapped into. Lord, Immortal or Warrior type. Each had more or...
Type: Posts; User: Divergent Reality
There was no gradual strip of souls. They died flat out during biotransferrence. Their minds were limited to what chassis they were strapped into. Lord, Immortal or Warrior type. Each had more or...
Even with Disrupton Fields they could hamper tanks quite well.
Now they are a bit more brutal.
It also allows Necron players to break away from the classic first 500 points in any list: Lord with resorb and 20 warriors.
A neat little survey. Lots of interesting questions.
As for a list of models we have in metal:
Nightbringer
Deceiver
Lord
Lord with Orb
Pariah
Immortal
Flayed Ones
Wraiths
Tomb Spyders
That was my exact thought for my tin heads. A Lord with resorb and 20 Warriors. The Warriors are iconic enough, they are all over the cover of the Codex. You can also look back to their 'glory...
What did they change within ebay that would cause problems with his listings?
The 4th ed glancing tables. It was so much easier to get to the creamy infantry centers of those metal boxes with my tin heads back then.
Its a damn cool looking model. Even for a non Imperial player, it is hard to deny the 'rule of cool' factor of its look.
I generally refer to my army in gender neutral terms. Tin heads have no real gender anymore. The only thing that receives a gender mention is the Nightbringer. My wife put boobs on it, so it is a...
As a Necron player these changes interest me.
Some new items and as Lerra suggested, placing the Tomb Stalker in the codex would be a neat addition.
A bit more patience and the collective...
I play Necrons.
My one and only 40k army.
they are a blast to play even with the limitations of the older codex in the 5th edition landscape.
I was having the exact same thought.
.
He looks pretty messed up.
This is continuously the worst change suggested for Necrons.
Adding sub commanders makes little sense for a consistent mechanical force that can silently communicate throughout its command...
My wish list for a future Necron update has several things.
Army wide special rule for Necrons:
Stubborn, Feel no Pain, Gauss.
Gauss can be fiddled with, making it only glance vehicles at a -1...
From the thread title I was expecting Kroot counts as Nids.
They are looking pretty fun. Cant wait to see the hq models you are putting together.
Necrons have also had some disappearing and reappearing codices on the gw web site.
It will be fun to see what all of this comes to be. Plus it will be fun to see another force that is something akin to a glass sword in 40k.
Less 3+ armor, horray.
Teleporting through the Monolith's portal is made at any time during the movement phase. If the Monolith and unit did not move before the teleportation the unit can still move, shoot and assault as...
25% of what they expect to make, or 25% of total 40k sales. I doubt Necrons have ever had 25% of the 40jk market.
Necrons are on the bad end of the current rule set. The force is restricted by the lack of options. Sure, during 4th edition all you needed was gauss spam and anything mechanized went boom. Now...
One of the internet's best Necron communities had a massive site removal a few weeks ago. The C'tan Support Group is back up and running.
You can find their new home here The C'tan Support Group.
so far there is little new and interesting. its ok for new players who have no idea about necrons. but for my tastes they are pretty lackluster tactics for necron units.