Insensitive remark? Hardly. I'd just like a few more sentences per paragraph. It would make your posts infinitely more readable. Why would I want your account deleted?
Type: Posts; User: The Tisroc
Insensitive remark? Hardly. I'd just like a few more sentences per paragraph. It would make your posts infinitely more readable. Why would I want your account deleted?
I can't read Xaric's posts. The consist of endless run on sentences. Xaric, please learn to use punctuation! You might be making valid points! I don't know because your posts are almost completely...
Page one of this thread indicated there was such a rule and I've been frantically looking for it...
Where can I find the rules that has Draigo making Paladins "objective secured"? I bought the codex today and cannot find that. Perhaps I am going blind. My mother warned me that might happen...
What is the problem? This is one tourney amongst many. It serves it's niche. What is wrong with that? Are you suggesting that all tourneys need to be the same? No TOs should ever tweak their own...
Sure. It sounds like fun. I dig how the TOs are taking control of their own gaming destiny! Go for it!
I have a Baneblade and a Knight... neither is ready to see a tabletop yet...
I concur: I'm also heavily invested in these games... I've come too far to stop!
Perfectly said, Tynskel. It couldn't be clearer.
I keep playing these games so I can hang out with my friends: cool froods like Caithsidhe and Plasticaddict. I will keep gaming as long as my compadres keep gaming.
Daboarder, I actually agree with you about the circular nature of this thread. Note: I'm not picking a fight with anyone. I agree with Tynskal's interpretation of the rules and disagree with...
So... someone disagrees with you so the thread needs to be locked?!
We must agree to disagree. The way I see it, that is clearly the rule. Again: I'm willing to roll for it if you and I ever play. Cheers.
This thread is pretty circular. I've already stated where I fall on this one. Walkers move like infantry. That's the rule. If we were playing a game and arguing about it I'd agree to roll off for it....
Yes. That is about the only advantage of taking a unit of three instead of just one.
- - - Updated - - -
Psychic Brood (page 45): A Zoanthrope brood follows all the rules ofr Brotherhood of...
:)
I can't see how Tynskel laying out how he sees the rules working is trolling. I agree with his interpretation. Reasonable people can disagree.
What? No. A unit of Zoeys can explicitly Warp Blast as many times as there are Zoeys in the unit.
Nailed it! Nicely and concisely stated! Again, if this came up during a game I was playing and my opponent and I simply couldn't agree (going around and around like this thread) I'd be willing to...
No. Because the rule that allows the walker to treat the tank traps just like infantry would kick in. However, if we were gaming I'd be OK with us dicing for it and moving on. I think you are wrong...
If I were in a game and someone insisted that my walker couldn't move through tank traps like infantry (even though my walker has a very specific rule that it moves like infantry) I guess we'd have...
So, Caitsidhe, my take on your thread is this: a Knight would have no good way of getting to a squad of Longfangs hiding under a Skyshield. Until they change the rules, that is just how it is....
It's clear to me that a Knight would move through a tank trap just as easily as a Firewarrior would. Walkers have a specific rule that overrides the tanktrap's rules. Walkers are specifically allowed...
Well said. Apoc is one thing and regular 40K is another. You have to be playing Apoc to use Apoc stuff (unless it's specifically designated for 40k).
Hello everybody!
I was discussing this with a good friend of mine today: can/should we use Apocalypse formations in regular games? His position is, "Yes. That is what VIIth Edition is all...