Reasonable balance is reachable. Perfect is too, just not a realistic expectation.
What we have here is GW making fluffy rules and forgetting that there is no point in playing if the result is...
Type: Posts; User: shiwan8
Reasonable balance is reachable. Perfect is too, just not a realistic expectation.
What we have here is GW making fluffy rules and forgetting that there is no point in playing if the result is...
Well now, is that not the point of these, to people have a chance to tell what they think would make the game better? In this case however you'll see that it is not the OP who wen to judge others for...
Like I said, not the same thing. I'm not arguing about wether or not it's realistic that a single use weapon can be reloaded or not. I doubt that people carry 7 gas canisters for a combi flamer...
Yes, but the logic I used was that when you have time to fix a blown track or tire you also have time to pick up a weapon even if it has a backpack attached to it. That versus the "there's no time to...
Now you are trying to apply logic in 40k while restricting each weapon type just to the least convenient version of it at the same time you assume that a phase in a turn is some how some static...
Techmarines have time to fix tanks mid battle, people have time to pick up a backpack and a weapon. Nids are a good point, but exceptions do not make rules and there are a lot of miniatures that have...
CoffeeGrunt: MO has nothing to do with riptide being a monster. That logic would also mean that there would be no walkers in the game at all.
Why does the s10 ap2 or better ignores cover have to...
Do you have any ideas? All I see is you telling others why their rough ideas are failures because they are not perfect yet.
I see no problem with that. The problem with riptide is the fact...
So, how would you fix/tweak 40k rules wise to make it better? I ask this because while 7th is the best edition rules wise according to general opinion, it's not perfect. Let's not make this about...
This is something I luckily do not have to do. That being said, I'm not in any way giving anything less than the absolute worst cheese I can field against the stupidly op codices I face. What I've...
Yeah, 4+ reanomation protocols for everyone. Lets kill the game totally, not just the matches against necrons.
Yes, but is it mandatory that some units are literally useless, some are broken and even the rest are not too balanced with each other? Could it be made more balanced in case of the 40k?
Yes,...
You missed my point. Things do not need to be equally powerful, only equally cost effective. The problem relly is not the deathstar nor is it the ever popular spamming. The problem is that...
You are perfectly entitled to have an opinion. However, balance can be that every unit is the same. It most certainly is that every unit is close to as good as the other. It is not impossible. It...
We seem to see this thing from very different angles. I personally look at a codex as a whole and I think your angle is is one that defines the power level of a codex solely by looking at it's...
I'll make this short. The message here was essentially "LTP noob" and "be a list hipster". Compare DA to eldar and see how relevant learning to play and not following net lists actually is.
Great article. Unfortunately the actual problems in 40k are still there. Codices are not equal or even semi close to it and CC is dead unless you play eldar or necron lists. Unless these are...