Hello all.
Some of you may remember my ill-fated "GW and Sexism" thread. It's closed no, and this isn't a re-tread of that; this is something else.
So anyway, I am writing a letter to GW about gender biases in their product. Boiled down to a nutshell, I want a male-to-female ratio of 50% of all models for those armies where such distinctions are relevant (so not Necrons or Orks, etc. but definitely including Space Marines - if you don't want female marines, fair enough, I don't and will never EVER get why, but fair enough) as it become necessary to update the miniature moulds.
My previous thread brought me a great deal of helpful advice from many, and as I've been mulling it over, and actually need some information from as many gamers as possible. Simply put, I would like to know:
1 - What's your gender? (Male, female, trans - if you prefer not to say, please don't respond; your information will not be helpful, given that it's a gender-based survey).
2 - What do you think of all the armies for the 40K game line (not WHFB - doesn't interest me is the only reason why; if you want to include your opinions of those, feel free), army by army and would you play them? All armies, all opinions please
So, to kick things off.
I'm male.
SM - Play them. Love them. Have since 1989. Like the design, like the playstyle, like the background. Don't get why they're all male (don't bother to explain - I've heard all the arguments, none of them satisfy me, if you disagree, cool, let's just disagree and move on )
Blood Angels - Play them. Love the Sanguinary Guard models. Love Death Company dreads.
Space Wolves - Detest them, because I basically can't stand the Viking aesthetic; couldn't care less about the rules, can't abide the whole hairy-man-with-an-axe-thing.
Dark Angels - Play them. Love the robes and homoerotic subtext. Deathwing has been cool since that first 40K short story collection.
Black Templars - Don't play. Robes are cool but a sword? To a gunfight? Can't suspend my disbelief that much. Battle of Crecy proved how dumb that plan is.
IG - Primary army of choice; love the fact that humans are essentially useless individually, but superb as a whole. Also love the tanks and wide number of unit choices.
Sister of Battle - Like them, don't play them due to all-metal models, and the poor sculpting on 90% of those models.
Daemonhunters - Like them, don't play them due to age of codex. Probably will do when new codex is released.
Eldar - Don't play. Love the idea, hate the all-metal army, and the fact they're not as elite as they should be.
Dark Eldar - Play them. Like them for the "Hellraiser" aesthetic.
Orks - Have an army but never play it. Like the number of dreads/kans you can field but can't face painting more than one or two boys... let alone the 9000 I'd need to paint.
Tyranids - Play them. Love them - have, ever since I first saw a Genetealer back with Space Crusade.
Necrons - Like the idea; hate the fact they're "Tomb Kings IN SPACE" when they should be Mechanical Cthulhus... if the new codex dropped the Egyptian thing in favour of Matrix-style bugtopuses, I'd be in. It won't, ever, so I'll never play them.
CSM - Don't play them, never will. The 80's ended over 20 years ago, I see no need to return to those awful, awful times.
Daemons - Don't play them. Would, if they looked scary, like the Helldorado demons. As it is, they either look lame or fruity, or some embarrassing combination of the two.
So, that's my opinion. What's yours?