On March 3rd, 2011, Chapterhouse Studios submitted a motion to dismiss. I'll post a bit of commentary about the content this weekend.
On March 3rd, 2011, Chapterhouse Studios submitted a motion to dismiss. I'll post a bit of commentary about the content this weekend.
Quel surprise?
I'M RATHER DEFINATELY SURE FEMALE SPACE MARINES DEFINERTLEY DON'T EXIST.
It isn't surprising that the motion was made, but the reasons are very interesting and the cited precedent is enlightening. The motion forces Games Workshop to make a tough choice. Again, I'm at work so I'll comment on the content this weekend when I have more time.
If anyone else has comments about it, I'd love to hear them.
double post
Last edited by weeble1000; 03-04-2011 at 03:26 PM. Reason: double post
Zut Alors!
I'M RATHER DEFINATELY SURE FEMALE SPACE MARINES DEFINERTLEY DON'T EXIST.
Hi all.
What does the 'motion to dismiss' mean?
Are they going to settle out of court?
Or are they forcing GW to refine thier claim and be more specific?
I have not got a clue about (American) legal terms?
Any clarification would be apreciated...
TTFN
Motion to dismiss is essentially in this case the presentation of preliminary evidence and case precedent that would suggest there is no case to answer and that it should be thrown out of court. If chapter house is successful it basically bends GW over and pulls down there pants.
http://badtouchsbasement.blogspot.com/