BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Results 1 to 10 of 292

Threaded View

  1. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eldargal View Post
    I don't think it is a stopgap codex, we've had rumours of it being worked on for nearly a year now. What I hope is that this is part of GWs rumoured plan to re-invigorate WD as a hobby magazine, they tested the waters with Spearhead and it was well recieved, now they are going further. I hope so, at any rate. I'd still prefer a real codex but if the quality is there it won't be so bad. The problem with the BA WD codex was that it was a poor effort.
    So wait. They were going on about how fantsey is meant to be the "high quaility" range, meant for the vet gamers. (Thus the hard cover army books.)


    What dose that now say about 40k if they codexs are now comping out in white dwarf articles?

    O.o

    Conflicting PR much?


    Edit: (On another note. sexy looking pics of the upcoming storm of magic stuff!)
    Last edited by Lockark; 06-10-2011 at 11:54 PM.
    Warhammer 40k = Emperor's Children(CSM) and Orks.
    Brush Fire: Historia Rodentia= Aquitar, Vandalands, and Ribenguo.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •