Rolling White Dwarf reviews

[Psychosplodge]

A battle report is quality content when not just centred around "look at the shiny new all kill-y unit we made...."

[wittdooley]

By that reasoning, none of the Battle Reports in any of the Magazines I mentioned are "quality content." They all focus their battle reports on how the new stuff works in a game.

FWIW, the Chaos army in the Battle Report in the new WD only uses one new monster model.

[HsojVvad]

isn't the WD battle reports fake? They are not actually really played?

[Psychosplodge]

They used to be more "real"

[Verilance]

bought it and read it,

I enjoyed it, it isn't WD issues 1-50 by a long shot but sadly for me those days are long gone.

[eldargal]

They play two or three games and pick the most interesting one for the battle report.

isn't the WD battle reports fake? They are not actually really played?

[Deadlift]

They play two or three games and pick the most interesting one for the battle report.

What you mean to say is they play 2 or 3 games and they pick the one that shows the new army winning

[eldargal]

Nope, new armies lose sometimes. I think either OnG or Skaven did most recently for Fantasy, I forget which for 40k.

[Grailkeeper]

I'll keep an eye on this thread, What ever happened to Paul Sawyer when he left? He droppped off the face of the GW planet. What ever happened to Space McQuirk? I just remember him for the silly name.


Hopefully they'll ditch the LoTR bit. It lanquishes unloved and unread at the back of every white dwarf I ever bought, pretty much the same as the sports bit in any newspaper I buy.

[BrokenWing]

Please GW, get rid of Lotr. Get rid of the game, get rid of the license, get rid of the White Dwarf section. Spend resources on a new, more interesting, more played game, or even just on the two you already have.