So, I made the mistake of loling at Ork shooting on the Lounge Blog on some issue or other which was really just a platform for a fungus infection joke that no one got. Someone pointed out that point per point Orks are as efficient at shooting as Dire Avengers.
10 Dire Avengers @ 120pts:
20 shots, 13.3 hit, 6.7 wound no save to the Ork= 6.7 dead orks or 33.5%.
20 Ork shoota boys @ 120pts:
40 shots, 13.3 hit, 8.8 wound, 4+ save on the DA - 4.4 dead DA or 44%.
But if we take into account casualties caused by the Dire Avengers:
14 Ork shoota boys
28 shots, 9.3 hits, 6.2 wounds, 3.1 dead DA or 31%
So twice as many Orks kill half as Dire Avengers as Dire Avengers kill Orks for a 2% lower efficiency.
Now from here on things get worse.
10 Dire Avengers, Exarch w Bladestorm and twin catapults @ 152 points.
30 shots, 20 hit, 10 wounds, no save so 10 Orks deceased or 40%.
25 Orks with shootas @ 150 points.
50 shots, 16.6 hit, 11.1 wounds, 5 DA deceased or 50%
But if we take into account casualties:
12 Orks shoot 24 shots, 8 hit, 4.6 wounds, 2.3 dead DA or 23%
So am I right to laugh at Ork shooting? Because honestly if they shoot first I'm incompetent.To be honest if I don't have at least one other shooting unit nearby to support the DA and an assault unit to assault the depleted Orks I'm also incompetent. Not to mention parking the DA wave serpent in front of them to foul up assault lines and give them cover and innumerable other factors.
In the three years since the Ork codex was released I've never felt Ork shooting to be a threat and I've never had an army shot up by them. Now I should say I am NOT underestimating Orks, I've just never been given cause to worry about their shooting.
So am I lucky, or is Ork shooting the least worrisome aspect of fighting them?
P.S. Nightspinners > Orks on foot.