Is this "Leaked" Tau Codex Fake?

[Kazwulf]

Unless it looks extremely official, i.e. comes in PDF format with images/fluff/content ... then I am always going to bet the codex is fake.

[yanhunt]

Is a well done fan codex, but sadly that's all it is. good effort from the guy who did it tho

[hammer hades]

This codex would grab gk and throw them out the window, its extremely overpowered, i am 99% sure this is a fake, but is a nice buff, and has obvioulsy had a large amount of work done on it, nice try for a fan dex!

[p00zer]

the fake is a lie.

[hammer hades]

that was a miserable attempt at tenth post...
Anyways, apparently some of the rules correspond with the 6th ed leaked rule book so we can keep hoping =)

[canoebuilder001]

Ha!

While some of the rules may look similar to the "leaked" info, this is a fan-dex. Who wouldn't like to take their army and tweak it to make it competitive. The Tau could use some help. But as you said, this is a very large buff too far. It seems to me like GW is phasing out eternal warrior, so the idea of every character having it is not very likely.

[phreakachu]

LOLMG... i know tau players are desperate for a new dex... but crap in a pita thats too over the top.

[Osiris]

So this is obviously a joke, either a 12 year old wrote this or an absolute troll wrote it. I read the special rules and nearly died laughing. Needless to say I stopped there.

Edit: I want my five minutes back, troll.

[Malachi]

I think this is the quintessential definition of a "wish-listing fan-dex." When you look that term up in the 40k dictionary, it will link to this document.

(Four Wounds, Eternal Warrior, and Counter Attack on every character? Come on....)

[Kur0n]

Totally a fake.