BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37
  1. #11
    Battle-Brother
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Gilroy, Ca
    Posts
    22

    Default

    There has also been interest/talk/etc.. in using railguns to launch supplies into space too.
    Corny faith and musty sorcery are no match for a good Gauss blaster.

  2. #12

    Default

    Pretty sweet. I wonder if these navy researchers play 40k...
    If they do, all i can say is "******* Tau fanboys"..

    Where's my bolter?
    Where's my chainsword?
    Wheres my lasgun?

    using railguns to launch supplies into space
    No matter what food they would pack in those containers, the astronauts better like pancakes, cos thats all they gonna be receiving with the G-forces required to shoot something into the high orbit

    Edit: Not ofc the G-force required, but the force and velocity where the G-forces are coming, silly me
    Last edited by Wildcard; 03-08-2012 at 01:38 PM.

  3. #13
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    9,675

    Default

    Actually, those are called mass drivers. They're essentially the same mechanism as a rail gun, but instead of sending a "small" hunk of metal at extremely high velocities they propel a very large mass like a space shuttle at moderately high velocities.

    They aren't being seriously considered to launch things in orbit from Earth, for the reasons Wildcard mentioned. However, if we were to build a moon base mass drivers would be one of the easiest and most efficient ways to send stuff up into the moon's orbit.



    As for [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOoUVeyaY_8"]bo[/URL][URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOoUVeyaY_8"]lt[/URL][URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-7L0Frj6vQ"]er[/URL]s, chainswords and lasguns, well, at least the first one is somewhat feasible. There's no actual conceivable reason to use a chainsaw as a military weapon, and lasers require massive, massive batteries and other equipment to use as an actual weapon.
    I am the Hammer. I am the right hand of my Emperor. I am the tip of His spear, I am the gauntlet about His fist. I am the woes of daemonkind. I am the Hammer.

  4. #14
    Scout
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    s.w.michigan
    Posts
    11

    Default

    i remember seeing this a while ago. wish i could see what would happen to a car after geting hit by that.

  5. #15

    Default

    Id like to see the damage one of these beasts could do....

  6. #16
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    9,675

    Default

    You actually can see it. Some of those videos show the projectile punching through a steel plate like it was paper. In fact, some of them show the performance of the projectile by measuring how many kilometers the projectile could still travel even after punching through a steel plate.
    I am the Hammer. I am the right hand of my Emperor. I am the tip of His spear, I am the gauntlet about His fist. I am the woes of daemonkind. I am the Hammer.

  7. #17

    Default

    Does anyone know why the projectile is shaped so strangely? It surprises me that it's not more streamlined/spinning from a rifled barrel. Maybe it's something they'll add later.

    On the other hand, getting hit by a supersonic chunk of blunt metal seems very grimdark future!

  8. #18

    Default

    Now that we have a successful test, we should be seeing these babies mounted on ships in the next few years.

  9. #19
    Brother-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kansas city, KS
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Criger View Post
    Pretty sweet. I wonder if these navy researchers play 40k...
    I lol'd so hard at the thought of this.

  10. #20
    Scout
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    16

    Default

    I wonder how long it takes for them to mount a railgun in a satilite? A kinetic energy weapon platform in orbit would definately give you the high ground. Not sure if the non nukes in space treaty covers that.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •