BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32
  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorWesJanson View Post
    Looks a lot like the old Armorcast/ Epic Baneblade.

    Why replace the Mammoth Tank with a knockoff Baneblade?
    Almost identical, in fact.

    I assume this is in response to Games Workshop giving the Necrons Tesla weapons. Presumably, GW will soon respond by releasing a SoB special character named Tanya...

  2. #22

    Default

    Nothing about this smells right. I can't help but wonder what direction GW legal will take on this one.

  3. #23
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    They won't.

    It's not a copyright violation.

    And EA's got way more money to feed their lawyers.

    But it's still not a copyright violation.

    Just like Starcraft isn't a copyright violation of 40k, even though it is -super- -super- similar in terms of its aesthetic and even some of its background.
    Armies Played (in order of acquisition)
    Crons, SW, SM, Tau, 1k Sons, IG, Nids, BA, DE

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kawauso View Post
    They won't.

    It's not a copyright violation.

    And EA's got way more money to feed their lawyers.

    But it's still not a copyright violation.

    Just like Starcraft isn't a copyright violation of 40k, even though it is -super- -super- similar in terms of its aesthetic and even some of its background.
    I'm by no means any type of Copyright expert but I have to agree. If the name of the tank or an emblem was ripped from GW than they have something to fight, but there isn't enough unique character in the Baneblade that GW can claim IP on to fight other large tank designs.

  5. #25

    Default

    I would wonder what the GW lawyers think about that?

  6. #26
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    They think that regardless of whether or not a case could be built, they don't have the money to go toe-to-toe with EA's legal team.
    Armies Played (in order of acquisition)
    Crons, SW, SM, Tau, 1k Sons, IG, Nids, BA, DE

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kawauso View Post
    They think that regardless of whether or not a case could be built, they don't have the money to go toe-to-toe with EA's legal team.
    Truth!

  8. #28

    Default

    I posted this on the Tiberium wars page on facebook the other day and the page admin commented saying they were dropping it.

  9. #29

    Default

    ^ Does that mean the Games Workshop Contacted them, or just pure coincidence?
    [I][I] =][= "Things are very seldom what they seem. In my experience, they’re usually a damn sight worse” =][=

  10. #30

    Default

    First thing i thought was, are they bring back something from dawn of war?

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •