BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Default GW to pull Indie Prize support

    I have a friend who runs two large indie events. He recently received a letter informing him that after May, GW will be pulling his prize support for his events to focus on smaller, in-store events. I believe that this was brought on by a series of factors. As a side note, I heard rumors that GW will be INCREASING the local in-store prize support by $75 a month. Could this herald the return of the old RTTs? First, the demise of Ard Boyz (which I am OK with) and now pulling Indie support, will Games Workshop return to their old ways? Also, what effect will this have on Indie turnouts? And in game Meta? Your thoughts? Reactions?
    Last edited by T-ORK-amada; 03-28-2012 at 09:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    9,675

    Default

    More likely they're washing their hands of the tournament scene. In recent years their handling of the few events they continued to run became more and more shoddy.
    I am the Hammer. I am the right hand of my Emperor. I am the tip of His spear, I am the gauntlet about His fist. I am the woes of daemonkind. I am the Hammer.

  3. #3

    Default

    I agree about the shoddy run GW tournies. They also have lost some people that were running them. But why pull support from people who are doing them right?

  4. #4

    Default

    GW is probably gearing up to create their own series of tournaments again. Pull the support from under the competition and ensure they are harmed financially.

    Supporting locals is always a good idea but I'll believe it when I see it.

  5. #5

    Default

    From what I understand, most tournaments aren't meant to make money. Most are run by gamers for gamers. Its about playing the game and making new friends. Why would GW try to alienate the masses. Now, I'm not saying all players play the Indie scene. Most Indies are played by people who are established in the hobby. I will not deny that GW worries about the bottom line and wants to make new customers, however I do see it pointless to shrug off the "die hards" for the "noobies". And how many actual Indies are out there? 100 maybe 200? If GW spent $500 a piece on these tournies for Prize support, it comes out to $100,000. A drop in the bucket. Also think of the free advertisement that these tournies generate. That has to be worth something.

  6. #6

    Default

    Why would GW try to alienate the masses.
    because they are not paying them ?
    tournaments where you get not prizes but discounts from GW shops [online or not] or bons which you can trade for stuff [again best to make it so that nothing good could be bought with them so people would be forced to use real money too] are better for them . + no large tournaments means in a year or two no one can say "look there were X large tournaments and army/build/codex Y seems not to be played , while still fresh" , they dont want noobs to go on to the net read stuff about an army not working and buying something else . they want them to buy 500-600pts of something find out that their friends meq army works 10x better and switch to a meq army too . Rises sells.
    also fewer large tournaments means fewer people points out bad rules they make and removes the need for FAQ or errate to some point . It is a win win situation for them .


    Also think of the free advertisement that these tournies generate. That has to be worth something.
    They know that tournaments and vets do most of the promo work for them , specialy if there are no GW shops near[which is true for most of the world] . But they just dont care . In their minds it is something vets owe them for making the best table top game in the world and the best models . And if someone things it is not totaly true , then it is his problem , not GWs.
    Last edited by the jeske; 03-29-2012 at 01:26 AM.

  7. #7

    Default

    As a T.O. for the Gateway Grand Trounament held at Diecon every year this will impact us somewhat, but not greatly. Right now the problem is that anyone wanting to run a GT has to wait for GW to approve it. Ed Spettigue (the guy who ran the GT Dept.) left GW US and they are busy picking up the peices. It looks as though GW is no longer going to be giving T.O.'s the customary $500 worth of scenery for their GT's either. Right now it's a real mess.
    "Wisdom means having the ability to admit what you do not know."

  8. #8

    Default

    The more and more I read about GW and their customer relations (as opposed to customer support) the more I wonder what brand of glue the guys at the top are sniffing. I would really like to know, so I can stay tyhe hell away from it. I mean, I read a couple years ago that the top executives not only did not play, but that they were actively contemptuous of the fan base. I didn't believe it at the time. But since then...

    This is just dumb. Even if they are looking at tourneys as a potential sales market, and are therefore maneuvering to take a run on it, not supporting your fanbase at the independent level is counterproductive.

    Of course, opening your own retail stores and putting yourself in direct competition with the people who are selling your product isn't exactly a good way to make friends anyway...

  9. #9
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    9,675

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck777 View Post
    GW is probably gearing up to create their own series of tournaments again.
    Not very likely. They've already geared up and tried out their own big tournament, and it failed horribly. I seriously doubt they'd be able to even justify another event even if they wanted to do one.
    I am the Hammer. I am the right hand of my Emperor. I am the tip of His spear, I am the gauntlet about His fist. I am the woes of daemonkind. I am the Hammer.

  10. #10
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    New Dixie, Dixie
    Posts
    572

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T-ORK-amada View Post
    however I do see it pointless to shrug off the "die hards" for the "noobies"
    And yet paradoxically their pricing seems driven towards making more money from their older, financially-more-secure players than by recruiting new, younger players (who increasingly cannot afford the start-up costs).

    I am mystified by this. But I guess that is why I left the corporate world.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •