BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Default Riptide Hammerhead Conversion Legality

    Guys,
    Fun little question here.
    For my Tau, I've always been a suit army builder. I'm just not a fan of Tau vehicles.
    Now, I love the Longstrike in a Hammerhead unit. It screams long range anti-tank to me. I've also been one of those players that like the Vanquisher/Pask combo even if there are better combos out there because I like the Tank Ace concept and the sheer giggle inducing power of shooting anti-tank 72" around the board.

    If you read the title you can see where I'm going with this...
    If I converted a Riptide to have a Railgun and SMS and made it obvious that it was an ace of sorts, do you think this would fly?/would you have any issues playing against it?

    In a tourney I could see the potential issues and would get the tourney organizer's approval but just wanted to start the idea rolling...

  2. #2

    Default

    Well ... I certainly wouldn't object to playing against a converted Riptide that counted as a Hammerhead. That said, I do note that you might have an advantageous firing position due to your height, and the large oval base is a smaller footprint than a Devilfish chassis, making you a harder target against blasts and the like. Since you count as a skimmer, the height of the model is not really much of a disadvantage - you likely have a 5+ Jink save no matter what, so it doesn't much matter that you would find it harder to be "in cover."

    These issues would not cause me personally to object to such a model, but they are the ones I see. One way to minimize them would be to pose your Riptide such that the railgun was at the same height as a Hammerhead's railgun.

  3. #3

    Default

    HI Nabterayl,
    Thanks for the reply.
    As for pose, I was planning to do a crouching, "absorbing the recoil" pose so it would be lower anyways.
    As far as footprint, any ideas on how I could negate that issue?
    Perhaps bring a cutout of the hammerhead hull with me and if it becomes an issue, do an overlay to see if it would hit on the regular hammerhead?

  4. #4
    First-Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,506

    Default

    if you don't like the Tau tanks, why not make the Riptide stand on top of the wreck of one instead of a regular base? that would add more to its height, to be sure, but the sheer amount of awesome would probably make most opponents agree to playing with it - would certainly convince me...

  5. #5

    Default

    Keeping a Devilfish template handy is probably a good idea; most people probably won't care about the size difference, but that way you always have a way to make the minority happy. I like the idea of using a Devilfish as a base, too, or you could literally base it on a Devilfish silhouette.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nabterayl View Post
    .... you could literally base it on a Devilfish silhouette.
    Crouching with a base like that idea would be the solution that no one could really get justifiably upset about.

  7. #7
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Oakland, California, United States
    Posts
    3,492

    Default

    I don't think anyone is going to care about the exact shape. It's not like GW considers the size of a model's base as part of their balancing act, or anything. I don't think "well, they're on large bases, which makes them a bit less flexible" is part of the advantage terminators have or anything. I don't think predators are costed lower because of their comparatively smaller rhino-based footprint, while chimeras are cheaper because they're a bit broader. It's true that there's a bit of a "big things are better" bias, but as long as you aren't doing something dumb ("this dude on a small base is a stand-in for a hammerhead... why are you laughing?") no one will care.
    ElectricPaladin Paints: http://tiny-plastic-dead.tumblr.com/
    ElectricPaladin Writes: burningzeppelinexperience.blogspot.com

  8. #8
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
    Posts
    1,228

    Default

    Even though it quickly becomes more a diorama than a conversion or counts-as I like the idea of a Riptide tearing the railgun off the Hammerhead and using it (while ghost riding the whip on top of the tank), but I don't know how you'd model the hands coming out of their little sheaths.

  9. #9

    Default

    Keeping a Devilfish template handy is probably a good idea;
    I (& my group) actually object this. We have a rule that if you proxy something, you go by the model itself that has before hand been agreed to be something else. If you start bringing in some templates or rules "how it would actually be if it was the real thing" will create lots of problems. And not least those where people have thought differently, just to be negated that flank shot / piece of cover just because someone pointed out that "your bulky unit x would actually be a lot slimmer". Another great point why to rule against "how-it-really-would-be" templates touches weapons.


    That said, I do note that you might have an advantageous firing position due to your heigh
    This. This problem goes as much in hand in hand with the quote before this. If you start to measure how your "real tank" would actually be able to fire it will sure lead to some unfortunate fights about how someone thought that it could / could not fire through that obstacle / under that piece of scenery.

    Also a concern of second nature. If you bring a unit type that is not currently allowed in normal 40k ( Tall vehicle ), there could be a serious change in meta of your gaming group.
    Just a quick scenario here: Your group thinks that there are x number of LOS blocking terrain that they usually place on table. That LOS blocking terrain is of such height that no tank can fire over it. Now, all of a sudden one tank can (and can claim cover behind it obviously)



    That said, i would most certainly like to see a well crafted custom piece on stand, but i just cannot make up my mind if i would be ok with it. It's one thing to change units from similar size category to other, (Bikers -> riders) or inside unit type x (from tank to tank). Its completely different (in gaming terms) to go for large mc to sleek tank
    ---------------------------------------

    However, if you would use it, i would go for plain base (with no foliage, tank wrecks, etc). Make sure to paint a WHITE X from corner to corner (preferably using the BOX-method), and then glue the model on top of that. (and maybe put a small marker, arrowhead or targeting mark in the front arc to make it always clear)

    That way, your opponent could always see how the lines were, of which direction the shot would come from (what armor values / bonuses / other stuff would have to be considered in case of shot / assaults etc etc)

  10. #10

    Default

    Make a cutout of the Hammerhead's shape from overhead, and use that to create a custom cardboard base. Now the unit has a base that is the same shape as the original model, so it's just as vulnerable to blasts. Make a diorama on it or something so it looks artistic, and you're set for all purposes.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •