Should super-heavy vehicles be usable in normal 40K?

[MaltonNecromancer]

Well?

[SilentNight1647]

Yes, because I heart Baneblades.

[Rev. Tiberius Jackhammer]

I'd be okay with it since the relationship between Hull points and Struture points makes them a bit less intimidating. Maybe restrict them to double FOC games, though.

[The AKH]

I wouldn't begrudge someone the chance to field their Baneblade above 2000 points, with the superheavy fielded as its own detachment.

[Mr.Pickelz]

I think the issue with Super-Heavies is the split fire function that "gun-boats" like the baneblade can offer, or the issue of taking up a large enough foot print that there won't be much room left to deploy/ move around on a normal table size, aka Titans.

[fuzzbuket]

whats the diffrence between 10 paladins, a techmarine, dragio and a warhound?

a warhounds easier to kill :P

[da_WaaaghMaster]

No. This would be bad, because I don't need a valid excuse to splurge on a Stompa.

[eldargal]

I'm not sure it is a good idea. Someone brings a baneblade to a 2000pt game, then their opponent brings a Revenant titan, the result would be tears. With Apocalypse you at least know what you are getting.

[Denzark]

Isn't it called Spearhead?

[eldargal]

Yep, Spearhead ahas a datasheet thingamie that allows you to take a single super heavy tank, but Spearhead is an expansion not regular 40k.