BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
  1. #1
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    183

    Default Dear Games Workshop

    Dear Games Workshop,
    Please change the Special Rule "Ignores Cover" to ignore cover. It was, and still is, silly when my Scout Sentinel made it's cover save against a penetrating hit from the enemy heavy flamer.


    Thank you,
    Turner

  2. #2
    Chaplain
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Consumed by the warp
    Posts
    317

    Default

    1: I don't think they will acknowledge this 2: they can't change it now and 3: that's helping you is it not.

    I have to take another look at templates I forgot the ignored cover in 5th
    Read this www.scribd.com/doc/123508033/Warhammer-40-000-6th-Edition-Codex-Adeptus-Aribites Then fill this out www.surveymonkey.com/s/LCFWXNV thanks

  3. #3
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Oakland, California, United States
    Posts
    3,492

    Default

    Wait, what's the problem?
    ElectricPaladin Paints: http://tiny-plastic-dead.tumblr.com/
    ElectricPaladin Writes: burningzeppelinexperience.blogspot.com

  4. #4

    Default

    Huh?

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Turner View Post
    It was silly when my Scout Sentinel made it's cover save against a penetrating hit from the enemy heavy flamer.
    Nope, you're just cheating/haven't read the rules properly/are TFG.

  6. #6
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElectricPaladin View Post
    Wait, what's the problem?
    My Scout Sentinel made it's cover save (in ruins mind you) against a pen from a heavy flamer. Grant it to make things worse the enemy failed the charge because of the whole charging through cover but the flamer template has the special rule called "Ignores Cover" which ironically, did not ignore cover.... I wish Games Workshop would change the special rule "Ignores Cover" to actually ignore cover.

  7. #7

    Default

    Is this just because it says "Ignores wounds"? I think the meaning to everyone on that is pretty clear.

  8. #8
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xenith View Post
    Nope, you're just cheating/haven't read the rules properly/are TFG.
    Interesting, maybe you should read "Ignores Cover". Page 38 if you need help.

  9. #9
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OrksOrksOrks View Post
    Is this just because it says "Ignores wounds"? I think the meaning to everyone on that is pretty clear.
    Yes, however a very slippery slope as I'm sure we have all found... The whole RAW vs RAI.

  10. #10

    Default

    It does need an errata, but it's hardly the end of the world. Houserule it if it is a problem, wait for GW to do it if it isn't.

    Also instead of writing a post on an internet forum it would be more productive writing to GW.
    Ask not the EldarGal a question, for she will give you three answers, all of which are puns and terrifying to know. Back off man, I'm a feminist. Ia! Ia! Gloppal Snode!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •