Found this article, though it doesn't go too in-depth into the game, it does shed some obvious light on a subject GW should take a look at (or maybe they already know.)
[url]http://confoundingblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/is-warhammer-balanced/[/url]
Comments? Ideas? It'sn ot a "full investigation" but still interesting.
BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
10-07-2009, 11:01 PM #1Brother-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Calgary, Canada
- Posts
- 58
Is Warhammer Balanced? Study says no
-
10-08-2009, 07:28 AM #2Chaplain
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- A-town, Texas
- Posts
- 452
Really? You started a thread on one of the most obvious things in Warhammer. When was the last time you heard O&G win a major tournament?
Pft.Borderline alcoholic and happy about it.
Don't get your religion mixed with my Constitution. The mixture curdles.
-
10-08-2009, 07:54 AM #3Brother-Captain
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- IA, USA
- Posts
- 1,403
Be nice - he's just making converasation!
Originally Posted by L192837465
But your point is valid - the study did remind of many a pointless or obvious news story!
It does however support the reasoning for 8th ed being leased earlier then it should have been.DWs: Prussains. KoW: Elves WM: Khador WHFB: Dwarves WH40: IG, SM
Games-workshop: changing the rules one new codex/army book at a time.
-
11-02-2009, 01:14 PM #4Battle-Brother
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 30
Obviously WHFB has taken a backseat, since it's last edition. Demons and Vampire Counts has re-injected some interested. I have a hard time with having to buy another rule book, or starter set for this game! I have not played much orf 7th, and haven't worked on WHFB projects for a few years. Since I have enough models for 5 sizable armies, I know I'll jump back in probably sooner than later!
-
11-02-2009, 03:04 PM #5Veteran-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Posts
- 132
Actually, when the seventh edition box set was released I was told that GW was moving to a 4 year cycle for both 40k and fantasy. This jives with 40k fifth edition’s release; so WHFB eighth edition is right on time. Originally Posted by Lord Azaghul
Dosadi"They created a desolation and they called it peace!" -- Tacitus
-
11-02-2009, 03:06 PM #6Chapter-Master
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 2,736
Surprised there weren't more IG players.....
To a New Yorker like you a hero is some kinda weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Tigers!
-
11-03-2009, 08:45 PM #7Brother-Sergeant
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Posts
- 94
I posted something like this in another thread, but I'll stand up against everyone here and say that i believe Warhammer Fantasy is a fair and balanced game. I've never had a list that was unbeatable and never fought an opponent that i couldn't destroy. I've played for years with almost every single army. I don't think bringing old armies up to the current 7th edition ruleset and philosphy should be considered power creep and firmly believe the lizardman army book (as the most recent so far) was extremly balanced and was really well rounded.
Now let the flaming begin.
Reply With Quote
