Warlords...

[Popsical]

Does anyone else agree that the Horus Heresy org chart with the warlord choice to get superheavies etc, is a far better way of playing large games of 40k? I for one cant stand Apocalypse, but would not mind the odd super heavy in large games of 40k.

[Kirsten]

I like the idea personally, I look forward to trying it out

[Popsical]

Do you think the "lord of war" slot will become the norm for all armies? Or has it already done so in 6th ed? I dont yet own a copy.

[DrLove42]

I don't know.

Superheavies are generally a little OPed for normal games. Even with hull points.

[eldargal]

It's a good idea, but Apocalypse is really a 'bring your whole collection to a game, FOC be damned' sort of thing. I like the fact there is hte option of a more controlled version for HH campaigns but I'd hate to see it replace Apocalypse entirely. Which I doubt GW would ever think of doing.

[Belial69]

My group are trialling it with the restriction of only over 2000pts and not more than 25% of your total points. (Which may be the way your supposed to or not, not read HH:B yet). So far not been too bad, as we're disallowing destroyer weapons.

[Popsical]

Your doing it right, 2000pts or more.
I feel this is a far better way to get games with super hevs that dont just revolve around who's got the most and biggest guns.