BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
  1. #1

    Default Dark Angels Fallen

    Hey guys,

    Something I've been wondering for a long time: what is the big deal about the Fallen? I haven't read the Heresy novels concerning the Dark Angels (hence why I'm asking this question), but from what I understand it sounds an awful lot like the Dark Angels are terrified that somebody might find out that, once upon a time, some Dark Angels fell to Chaos. Unlike, you know, EVERY OTHER LEGION EVER.

    ...

    Are the Dark Angels really planning to spend an unforeseeable amount of time hunting an unknown number of traitors whose fate, not to mention whereabouts, are unknown, because they can't stand the thought that somebody might find out that such traitors existed once upon a time, and might still exist? Do the Dark Angels even have a reputation of not having any renegades on their rolls?

    Or ... is there something else going on? I mean, I can accept (and love) space marines being insufferably self-absorbed pricks, I just want to leverage others' reading.
    Last edited by Nabterayl; 10-30-2012 at 11:19 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    6,452

    Default

    That's prettymuch it, though there is a bunch of guilt and repentance thrown in there - they want to find them to bring them to justice to atone for their sins so the Emperor will forgive them (which may or may not be what Cypher is up to). Not all the fallen are evil chaos worshipers either, as they were cast through space and time, so some when found are repentant and recieve a quick death when they realise what they did by turning on their brothers.

    I think though that rather than just the fall to chaos it's more that they fell during the heresy, and fell en masse. Whilst some of the traitor legions had guys who stayed good, none of the other loyalist legions had guys turn bad at that time (that we know of at the moment). The betrayal was also less about fighting against the Emperor and more fighting against the part of the legion who abandoned the fallen on Caliban.

  3. #3

    Default

    Do the Dark Angels have any lore about not having any subsequent renegades?

  4. #4

    Default

    The issue with the Fallen is that the "Loyalist" DAs might not actually be as loyal as the Imperium believes. To fully understand the issue though, reading the older fluff helps, especially Angels of Darkness by Gav Thorpe (see link below).

    The Horus Heresy series has also helps by explaining that the Imperium's goals are very different now than they were during the Crusades. For example, worshipping the Emperor then was forbidden whereas now it is forbidden.

    [URL="http://www.amazon.com/Angels-Darkness-Warhammer-40-000/dp/0743443497"]http://www.amazon.com/Angels-Darkness-Warhammer-40-000/dp/0743443497[/URL]

  5. #5

    Default

    I ... don't think I understand. It's not as if the Inner Circle seriously fears the Fallen approaching the Imperium and saying, "Little did you suspect that for the past ten thousand years the Dark Angels have secretly ..."

    I don't even know how to finish that sentence. Secretly been working against the Imperium? The Dark Angels act like insufferable pricks, but no moreso than any other marine chapter. Put their own needs above that of the Imperium? Well of course; they're space marines. Secretly attacked Caliban, rather than the other way around? Why should anybody other than Dark Angels care about that?

    EDIT: Let me take a step back and ask a broader question: do the Dark Angels care about their "secret" getting out? Or is the current lore that they view this as an internal matter?
    Last edited by Nabterayl; 10-30-2012 at 01:23 PM.

  6. #6

    Default

    Actually the DA do act more insufferably prickish than most other Marine chapters. Certainly more so than Sallyminders and Ultramorons. There's some more prickish out there, like Minotaurs and Black Templars, but DA are the worst of the first founding when it comes to relations with the Imperium at large.

    The reasons the DA _currently_ care are because it's chapter tradition. Full stop. However, in M31 and M32, they cared precisely because they were the only loyalist legion (not chapter) to undergo a full split. That's the simplest view I think, although I accept that may become more fluffed at some point.

    The symmetries between Dark Angels(First Legion) and Alpha Legion (Last Legion) are all over the place if you take some viewpoints. If the Lion was actually being disloyal during the Heresy by waiting to see who one whilst Alpha was actually being loyalist but playing double agent, then there's more to the symmetry than just first vs. last and general secretiveness.
    If this is the way mankind ends up, I'm rooting for the Orks.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by inquisitorsog View Post
    Actually the DA do act more insufferably prickish than most other Marine chapters. Certainly more so than Sallyminders and Ultramorons. There's some more prickish out there, like Minotaurs and Black Templars, but DA are the worst of the first founding when it comes to relations with the Imperium at large.
    I'm not sure I buy that, except that they're the worst of the First Founding chapters. What do they do other than turn down requests for help for their own self-important reasons, show up places where the Imperium might have other strategic concerns without prior notice or coordination with other Imperial forces that may be present, plan and execute their own missions without regard to how that might screw up the plans of other Imperial forces or without regard to whether the other forces present need their assistance, and then leave?

    I mean ... that may not be all marine chapters, but as I understand it, it's the standard.

    So what I'm hearing at this point is that they care because they once cared, but it's not as if they're living in fear that somebody will find out that they have renegades in the closet and ... I dunno, not invite them to the next cocktail party. That about (flippantly) accurate?

  8. #8

    Default

    The basic idea is that the loyalist legions stayed true to the Emperor 100%. To a man (Astartes) they were loyal and unflinching in the face of Heresy. Whether this is entirely true or not doesn't matter.

    The Dark Angels are an anomaly in that some of them turned against their Primarch and the Emperor. This means that the inquisition, were they to find out, would probably see the geneseed of the DA as tainted and would be likely to order exterminatus on them. To add to this the DA themselves might partially believe that they are tainted or impure in some way and are trying to repent in the way that they always have, by removing the fallen from history.

    They are willing to carry this out at all costs as evidenced by the fluff in the BT codex where an entire (albeit small) crusade was destroyed because they had found one of the fallen before the DA.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeshin View Post
    The Dark Angels are an anomaly in that some of them turned against their Primarch and the Emperor. This means that the inquisition, were they to find out, would probably see the geneseed of the DA as tainted and would be likely to order exterminatus on them.
    I don't have my codex (or novels, etc.) handy. Can you provide a cite for that? I don't think I've heard before that there's some notion running around that old traitors taint your geneseed more than new traitors. I can buy that such an obviously stupid notion might have currency, but I'd love to know where in our sources it's found.

  10. #10

    Default

    While the treachery of the Fallen may have happened 10,000 years ago, keeping it a secret from the Inquisition for 10,000 years is a pretty big crime on its own. And that is a crime they still commit, unrepentantly, en masse.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nabterayl View Post
    I don't think I've heard before that there's some notion running around that old traitors taint your geneseed more than new traitors.
    Who suggested this?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •