Yeah, the way they handle peer reviews is pretty terrible. That said, ultimately only the co of ocs, colonel stillings, atm, has the authority to drop someone, so if I go to boards I'll eventually go through him and have a chance to explain myself in a way I can't to the other staff.
Ultimately, though, it all comes down to a simple decision for me. After all I've learned, do oli want to continue to put myself in a leadership position of as such extreme stress and responsibility as leading Marines into combat? I know I can do it, even if I have some things to learn still (but that's what TBS is for ocs is just a screener for potential). I'm not sure if it's the job I want, though, and that's something I could only know after trying it out for a while. I've basically completed training, we have like two academic tests left and a final pft, and everything else is just out processing and moto-pt sessions over the next two weeks. It's not a matter of whether or not I can tough out the next two weeks, just if I want to accept my commission or not (ignoring the boards and the possibility of getting dropped) if that makes sense. I'm generally a good team player, and I can definitely be a good leader, but I'm undecided if I want to be a leader as my specific job. I've always been a bit too independent minded to mesh in well with the ideal of the Marine officer. That's the choice I have to make, and it was only indirectly triggered by the peer eval incident.
Incidentally, I was only in the middle of the squad rankings because 1) I'm actually pretty quiet and "sneaky" (I tend to get stuff done without anyone noticing, for better or worse) so unless you get to know me I don't really seem very decisive or leader-ish, and 2) we have a very strong squad. We have two candidates in the top 5 overall, 5 are enlisted Marines including a gunnery sergeant, and a couple of guys who are the football captain/quarterback natural athlete/leader types. The competition for the good rankings is extremely tight.