I was reading through a now-closed thread on Chaos supplements, and someone osted the following interesting link:
[url]http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/448304.page[/url]
Which shows rumour mongers against accuracy.
Now I know this is slightly flawed as a measure of effect for the following reasons:
1. Whilst it would be possible to verify the data therein, ie who posted what and when, I for one don't know for certain as I don't follow everyone's postings. So for example if the author poppoed in that Rumour monger A popped in a rumour about a life-sized bust of the Emperor's testicles coming out in October, and actually Rumour Monger A said no such thing, I wouldn't know the difference.
2. I don't know how they account for whether or not the rumourer is publishing their own-acquired rumours, or just re-publishing someone elses.
3. I don't know how they acount for when a rumour thread like the ones on BoLS, is updated in the same thread - is that one count or is it one per update?
However i find the data interesting. Of note, our Eldargal is rated as 50% accurate, with BigRed batting about 33%.
How does anybody else rate accuracy of the rumour millers?