Weeble ive been following this case from the start that wasn't hyperbolic opinion that was strong legal opinion based on the documents and if you have read my other comments you would know I have the knowledge to back up my opinion.
Confusion after the case is a non issue though its confusion before the case which leads to legal action. If people have been confused by the use before the trial then GW can and did claim, successfully I might add, that there is infringement. I would also note that my opinion on what GW would appeal was spot on, I stated they would appeal on misdirection of law to the jury which is the case here, and I strongly agree with it, I can see CHS side but I really do feel it is clutching at straws.