BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Netherlands, Rotterdam
    Posts
    155

    Default Split fire and assaulting

    Hey,

    I had a battle against Eldar and we got to someting where we didn't know what to do. My tactical squad was already in assault, his dark reapers with farseer had the split fire power, he wanted to assault my tacticals but before he did that he made his split fire leadership and shot with the reaper excharge on a diferent target. Now can his farseer and reaper unit charge the tacticals? Rules say you have to charge what you shoot, but split fire gives you the option to shoot at a diferent target, so...what happens then? Can he charge? Does he get the +1 for charging or is it considered a disordered charge. We decided that he could charge but didnt get the assault bonus. But im still unsure if this was correct. What are your thoughts?

  2. #2
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    [see below]

    There is a whole discussion about whether or not the model that split fires is part of the unit for shooting purposes but ho-hum.
    Last edited by Wolfshade; 10-16-2013 at 07:35 AM. Reason: skim read question
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  3. #3

    Default

    If your tactical squad was already engaged in close combat they are not valid shooting targets. Therefore it doesn't matter if they had the split fire power since they cannot select the tactical squad as a target. So he can either shoot at something (or two somethings with split fire) or charge your tactical marines.

    At our store the general consensus for split fire and charging is that it has to be one of the targets shot at.

  4. #4
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    I skim read that. You are quite right Aegymourn.

    You cannot assault what you do not shoot at (generally). It isn't a case of split fire since the non-split fired target is not a valid target so you can't shoot at it.

    You can assault it but must forego your shooting. It might have been a more preferable option to detach the farseer and assault with them and leave the Dark Reapers to shoot at other viable targets.
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  5. #5
    Chaplain
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    262

    Default

    Well, wait, hold on a sec.

    What does split fire rule have anything to do with the question...

    From what the OP has described, the Farseer and Reapers fired on a target, but also wished to charge a squad already engaged in combat.

    You could do this even without the split fire rule.

    Charge what you shot at, multi- charge both units, but suffer a disordered charge.

    Heck, the Farseer and Reapers could split fire to targets A & B, then charge into A, B, C.

    What you can't do is shoot one target and only charge an entirely different target. IE, you can't shoot A, and only charge B, or with split fire, shoot A & B, but only charge C.

  6. #6
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    Well it all depends if the unit that the reaper exarch wants to fire on is within charge range or no. If it is then you might be able to do what you suggest if the placement is helpful, otherwise you can't.
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfshade View Post
    You cannot assault what you do not shoot at (generally). It isn't a case of split fire since the non-split fired target is not a valid target so you can't shoot at it.
    Bad wording in that sentence because you don't have to shoot at something to assault it. Also with split fire it just says that one model immediately fires at a unit, then you resolve all the other shooting which if you wanted to assault an engaged unit then you can choose not to fire.

    Personally I would have let the player split fire and then assault the marines normally.

  8. #8

    Default

    Angelofblades is right. If you shot, you may not declare a target you did not shoot at as your primary charge target. If you use Split Fire to shoot at two targets, either of them may be your primary charge target. If you fire at only one target, using Split Fire or not, only that target may be your primary charge target.

  9. #9
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Asuryan View Post
    Personally I would have let the player split fire and then assault the marines normally.
    But the one "target" was already locked in assault so could not be shot at, regardless of split fire or no.
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  10. #10
    First-Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,633

    Default

    I have to look and may be wrong. From what I remember you have fo declare a primary target and than the secondary for the splitfire. Your assault can only be directed at a primary target. It is possible to multi assault multiple units. However to do so yoou need to keep 2inch consolidation and you have to be base to nase with as many models as possible. Which means it would be r athed hard flr a typical 6 man unit to assault more than one squad. Even harder if you are trying to assault three units. This is another reason why big units is a good thing.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •