BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 212 of 773 FirstFirst ... 112162202210211212213214222262312712 ... LastLast
Results 2,111 to 2,120 of 7723
  1. #2111

    Default

    Yup. Up market student digs type accomodation.

    Bedroom Tax - I get where they're coming from, but it makes no allowance for the general scarcity of smaller housing stock. On account it was sold off, and no replacements built.
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  2. #2112
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    I never understood why they didn't find a cheapish patch of land in a reasonable distance of Westminster and build some dorms. They could even lay on a coach to ferry them back at the end of the day. It'd still probably be cheaper than 500+ second homes?

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  3. #2113

    Default

    Admiralty Arch. I do believe that's currently vacant?
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  4. #2114
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Mystery View Post
    Yup. Up market student digs type accomodation.

    Bedroom Tax - I get where they're coming from, but it makes no allowance for the general scarcity of smaller housing stock. On account it was sold off, and no replacements built.
    I think if there is no smaller place to move into then certainly they should be excempt. But there is an issue that we cannot force people into a smaller house at the moment. But if people in public rented properties get a bit of cash for their unused bedrooms, why don't those in private sector housing with the same housing benefit get it? Surely, regardless of housing type if you recieve the benefit it should be equal? Or is there any particular reason those in private sector rented properties, recieving housing benefit, should be treated differently?

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychosplodge View Post
    I never understood why they didn't find a cheapish patch of land in a reasonable distance of Westminster and build some dorms. They could even lay on a coach to ferry them back at the end of the day. It'd still probably be cheaper than 500+ second homes?
    Yup. Though it might become a target for terrorism...
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  5. #2115
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    *shrugs*
    MPs are easily replaced, plus security should be reasonably easy on a single location?

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  6. #2116
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    Oh it all makes sense, you could even have a lounge, bar, restuart, gym all inside.
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  7. #2117

    Default

    Indeed. Build it custom. Bomb proof, and secure.

    Job jobbed, and no more second house expense scandals at all. And why not have a little restaurant in there too, so they can eat in. And if they eat out? Hey, tax payer offered your restaurant, you'll have to pay for your own if you turn that down.

    Biggedy. Biggedy. Bong.
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  8. #2118
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    We could call it the Flats of Parliament
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  9. #2119

    Default

    Bedsit of Lords?
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  10. #2120

    Default

    [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2600213/Has-Game-Thrones-gone-far.html]And a right fail for Das Daily Meinkampf[/url]

    They reckon GoT has 'shocked fans' with the prossies and violence in the first episode of season 4.

    Yes. Because there are certainly no prossies, violence, bad language, gore, or anything like that in the preceding three seasons. Season so peaceful and nice many wondered if they'd accidentally tuned into Teletubbies. Definitely not a season renowned for it's mature themes throughout.
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •