Yarrick's Senior Officer Rule and Warlord

[Blood Shadow]

What's more important is that in the ibooks version Yarrick doesn't have stubborn! What's that about?

[The Sovereign]

What's more important is that in the ibooks version Yarrick doesn't have stubborn! What's that about?

Another good point. Just went and checked for meself.

[Gleipnir]

So remove Chain of Command from Yarrick, add Stubborn and Bob's your uncle everyone happy.

[Blood Shadow]

So remove Chain of Command from Yarrick, add Stubborn and Bob's your uncle everyone happy.

Well yes this ^^^. Except he used to be Fearless.....

[The Sovereign]

So remove Chain of Command from Yarrick, add Stubborn and Bob's your uncle everyone happy.

Hopefully they'll do this in the next couple of days.

[Tzeentch's Dark Agent]

Oh yeah, they are uploading the FAQs in a couple of days, I know that much. They may be delayed, no longer than two weeks away.

Plus, they are going to be updated too.

[Gleipnir]

Oh yeah, they are uploading the FAQs in a couple of days, I know that much. They may be delayed, no longer than two weeks away.

Plus, they are going to be updated too.

That would be a plus, we haven't had a real FAQ update since Chaos Daemons 15 months ago

[John Bower]

Chain of Command plainly disallows Yarrick from being a warlord, ever, for the reasons Gleipnir said. Just as clearly, that can't be the intent - otherwise he wouldn't have a specified warlord trait. But ... what then is the point of him having Chain of Command? Why not just leave it off? The only answer I can come up with is that even Yarrick is not allowed to be your warlord if your primary detachment contains another model with the Senior Officer rule. He's still a commissar - he isn't going to take command of somebody's company unless the company commander has proven himself incompetent.

The guy took command of the ENTIRE Armageddon military in the position pretty much of a Lord Commander Militant. So yes he can be your warlord regardless. He IS a senior officer so that automatically gives him the right regardless of who is present.

[Nabterayl]

The guy took command of the ENTIRE Armageddon military in the position pretty much of a Lord Commander Militant. So yes he can be your warlord regardless. He IS a senior officer so that automatically gives him the right regardless of who is present.

In your view, then, Chain of Command does nothing in Yarrick's case, and its inclusion was simply a mistake?

[Lord Asterion]

As he has Senior Officer, he can be the Warlord, Chain of Command is probably just because he's a Commisar and outside the normal chain of command