40K Rulebooks, Starter Sets and Psychic Cards Pulled - 7th Ed 40K Imminent?

[Eldar_Atog]

Not really. All I'd have to do is find out if that "detachment" is 500 points or more.

Which you would find by looking in a book/pdf

[Defenestratus]

Which you would find by looking in a book/pdf

Not really. All I'd have to do is look on the other player's roster which has point values on it.

But you keep on rollin with your FOC lovin'. Its a clunky, unwieldy design that has outgrown its original specification.

[StarWarsDoug]

Not really. All I'd have to do is look on the other player's roster which has point values on it.

But you keep on rollin with your FOC lovin'. Its a clunky, unwieldy design that has outgrown its original specification.

Unless the other player decided to flub some numbers here and there in the roster. This has been a regular occurrence at local tournaments here with many people now banned.

[Defenestratus]

Unless the other player decided to flub some numbers here and there in the roster. This has been a regular occurrence at local tournaments here with many people now banned.

Thats not a problem specific to any game design however. Dumb people who care more about proving their prowess with toy soldiers than having fun will cheat. This is known. It doesn't matter if they're using a FOC or a percentage based system.

[DarkLink]

% wasn't going to change it either.

Actually, yes, they would. None of the stars are legal if you're limited to 25% hq and 25% elites. You can take much, much weaker versions of them and still technically get a rerollable 2+, but the seer council would only have like four guys in it compared to ten warlocks, the baron, and two farseers.

[Clockwork]

Actually, yes, they would. None of the stars are legal if you're limited to 25% hq and 25% elites. You can take much, much weaker versions of them and still technically get a rerollable 2+, but the seer council would only have like four guys in it compared to ten warlocks, the baron, and two farseers.

And then a week later a new meta with new deathstars crops up.

% doesn't stop death stars in Fantasy, it can't stop it in 40k either.

[Eldar_Atog]

Not really. All I'd have to do is look on the other player's roster which has point values on it.

But you keep on rollin with your FOC lovin'. Its a clunky, unwieldy design that has outgrown its original specification.

Ahh, you are talking about the other player. I am talking about when you yourself are building an army list. I don't usually worry over the opponent's list.

[daboarder]

Actually, yes, they would. None of the stars are legal if you're limited to 25% hq and 25% elites. You can take much, much weaker versions of them and still technically get a rerollable 2+, but the seer council would only have like four guys in it compared to ten warlocks, the baron, and two farseers.

Thats assuming warlocks would count towards the %, Im willing to bet that "slotless" units would not

[Bigred]

via [URL="https://www.facebook.com/Lordsofwargaming?ref=br_tf"]Lords of War[/URL] Gaming:

"A new Realm of Battle board will be released with 7th edition. This board will have a "40k/City" theme and will be 6' x 4' with a travel bag like the current Realm of Battle Board."

"[Lords of War Gaming] is calling BS on the whole "percentages" for your forces in 40K."

"The next 40k army after Orks will be Space Wolves. Stay tuned for more information on Orks and Space Wolf releases."

[daboarder]

hmmm may actually fork out for a RoB this time.

Ive tried to start my own boards time and time again and it just never takes off for me