Actually it's attitudes like this one that I find most despicable. You say you're annoyed with people who only want to win and expect their book to automatically trump everyone else's. What you don't admit is that the ork book has been languishing for years and each consecutive edition of the game has had an every increasing negative impact on this out of date codex.
The truth is people like you rush out and try to grab whatever the current "best" codex is, they spend endless hours netlisting and trying to come up with the most over-powered cheese build they can think of and then commit their time and resources into that build so they can steamroll everything in sight. They cannot understand any reason for wanting a new list to be better than crap beyond their own view of powergaming, and they hate when GW overpowers a new book because it threatens the previously established meta that they are already concentrating on.
It's the height of hypocrisy when these power-gaming clowns then decide that it's unfair for someone who has been laboring for years with an outdated edition-nerfed codex to want it improved on, as all they have been sitting there helplessly watching their army get worse and worse edition after edition. When instead the new book comes out and it's a huge mess, people like Blythicus rush out and attack the unhappy ork fans, "how dare they want to threaten the powerbuilds like eldar and tau!" All an ork's good for is providing a bumbling npc character to blast off the tabletop so these fragile ego power-gaming hypocrites can feel good about themselves.
It's just discusting to me that anyone would be so pathetic and unfair as to attack an unhappy ork player for not liking what is his lot in life: to wait through another 7 years being cut to pieces by the same power-gaming net-bullies who ridicule them for their just anger at GW for easily one of the most poorly written books they have ever produced.