BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 102
  1. #31
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    Meh, We all know the Star wars ships would win anyway
    But I still think the 40K ones would outdo the star trek ones.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  2. #32
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    They are not the militaries of either planet, nor were they acting on behalf of their respective governments.

    Plus the scimitar (picard's clone ship) with it's radiation weapon can strip life in seconds which is shorter than torpedos or virus bombs etc.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychosplodge View Post
    Meh, We all know the Star wars ships would win anyway
    But I still think the 40K ones would outdo the star trek ones.
    I think that the star wars have the problem of the 40k they are big and not movable, so require fighter wings, but there weaponry and defensive systems aren't great
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  3. #33
    First-Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfshade View Post
    But that is because the D'deridex-class, B-type is awesome. This is without taking into account the big birdie that the Picard clone built for Nemsis
    which is still something like a tenth the size of proper Imperial battleships; same for Negh'Var and Sovereign, which are something of the staple "big ships"...
    it's impossible to say who would win a space fight though, mainly because we can't really gauge how the respective shielding techs work out against the other's weapons... the larger size of 40k weapons will probably be offset somewhat by manouverability on the Trekkies' part, but weapon range is another matter - from what I remember Lances have ranges in the hundreds of thousands of kilometers, while Trekkies usually fight at single or at most double digit kilometer ranges...
    The bigger they are, the bigger the mess they make when they step on you. - Ahzek Ahriman, on Titans

  4. #34
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfshade View Post
    - - - Updated - - -



    I think that the star wars have the problem of the 40k they are big and not movable, so require fighter wings, but there weaponry and defensive systems aren't great
    I think [URL="http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html"]these comparisons[/URL] based on observations give a reasonable idea.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  5. #35
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Undertaking private security operations somewhere in the Human Sphere
    Posts
    5,884

    Default

    I only see one civilisation that has survived 10,000 years of war against everything from itself to voracious aliens, re-awakened automatons, Cokneys, and Malicous Sentient Gods of raw emotion
    Morbid Angels:http://www.lounge.belloflostsouls.net/showthread.php?7100-Morbid-angel-WIP
    I probably come across as a bit of an ***, don't worry I just cannot abide stupid.

  6. #36
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    That's a good point.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  7. #37
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyrendian View Post
    which is still something like a tenth the size of proper Imperial battleships; same for Negh'Var and Sovereign, which are something of the staple "big ships"...
    it's impossible to say who would win a space fight though, mainly because we can't really gauge how the respective shielding techs work out against the other's weapons... the larger size of 40k weapons will probably be offset somewhat by manouverability on the Trekkies' part, but weapon range is another matter - from what I remember Lances have ranges in the hundreds of thousands of kilometers, while Trekkies usually fight at single or at most double digit kilometer ranges...
    We have already established that 40k weapons are less powerful comparing the effects of a standard issue bolter vs a standard issue phaser/disrupter. Then upscaled to affects on planets...

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychosplodge View Post
    I think [URL="http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html"]these comparisons[/URL] based on observations give a reasonable idea.
    A couple of things I wouldn't trust anyone who has such a badly formatted webpage, then goes on to make comparisons between military ships and the Enterprise which is a science vessel not a capitol warship as claimed throughout (fool). If you must compare it to a starfleet ship then you have two options really, the Defiant or Vengance (STID).
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

  8. #38
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    The page is very old.
    Is the Enterprise not the flagship?

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  9. #39
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Undertaking private security operations somewhere in the Human Sphere
    Posts
    5,884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychosplodge View Post
    That's a good point.
    Thank you, I think it illustrates the point.

    Remember its not just the gun, its how far you are willing to go, and the Trekkie and Wars universes don't make a regular thing of exterminatus. No one does "total war" quite like the imperium
    Morbid Angels:http://www.lounge.belloflostsouls.net/showthread.php?7100-Morbid-angel-WIP
    I probably come across as a bit of an ***, don't worry I just cannot abide stupid.

  10. #40
    Occuli Imperator
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Mercia
    Posts
    18,062

    Default

    No.

    A flagship is any ship commanded by an admiral, indeed any navy would have a number of flagships. Then you have the flagship of the fleet (which the Enterprise is akin to). Then any ship in charge of a group would be the flagship so when Defiant takes over command of the fleet it becomes that fleet's particular flagship.

    In the motion pictures where Kirk is an admiral the Enterprise is a flagship

    Most of the time though the Enterprise is captained by a captain, without a fleet so it is wrong to call it a flagship as it has neither a fleet to command nor an officer of flag.

    It is sometimes used in the venacular to say it is the best in the fleet but that isn't an official title.
    Fan of Fuggles | Derailment of the Wolfpack of Horsemen | In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •