BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 90
  1. #71
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    1,220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grimmas View Post
    Granted but I was more commenting on the time these things take for any noticeable effect. I thought the height change was more to do with improvement in nutrition of the last century rather than natural selection?
    It's both. From memory I think it's about 3/4 nutrition and 1/4 genetics, but it's definitely partly evolutionary. Although scientists haven't nailed down WHY: it could be as simple as sex selection, or it could be that tall genes occur alongside some other beneficial mutation.

    Under the right pressure adaptions can show noticeably within a few hundred years (ignoring really sudden stuff like the Black Plague) so there would definitely be some over ten thousand. But without being able to compare the two they may be harder to spot.
    Kabal of Venomed Dreams

  2. #72
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    It'll be cause it helps you reach the pedals in the car better, and if you're too short you can't jam the brakes on as hard. Natural selection in all it's glory.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  3. #73
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Her Majesty's United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgrim View Post
    It's both. From memory I think it's about 3/4 nutrition and 1/4 genetics, but it's definitely partly evolutionary. Although scientists haven't nailed down WHY: it could be as simple as sex selection, or it could be that tall genes occur alongside some other beneficial mutation.

    Under the right pressure adaptions can show noticeably within a few hundred years (ignoring really sudden stuff like the Black Plague) so there would definitely be some over ten thousand. But without being able to compare the two they may be harder to spot.
    Cheers Morgrim I was making the mistake of thinking the adaptations needed to be permanent and forgetting It is very gradual process and that every adaptation doesn't result in a new spieces. You'll have to excuse me the biological texts went away after Uni(worryingly quite a while ago now). Always nice to brush up though.
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit
    Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.

  4. #74

    Default

    Another point about evolution is that it can only improve, rather than create.

    I.e., the human eye is descended from the same design lineage as fish eyes, the same as most other animals. However, it's actually not that great for seeing on land, there are better systems that could be used. Evolution can't make these systems just appear, though, it needs the creatures with the weaker systems to die without breeding so that the ones with the better system prosper and propagate. Since most creatures on land use the eye in mostly the same design pattern, there's no real imbalance in evolutionary advantage that has ousted it.

    It's like the evolutionary equivalent of the Sherman tank. Not the best by practically any means, but good enough for the job.
    Read the above in a Tachikoma voice.

  5. #75
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    ?
    Whats the issue with the eye and how could it theoretically be better?

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  6. #76

    Default

    The eye is filled with liquid, which was an evolution that allowed it to see in water without refraction, giving it greater clarity. However, it now suffers refraction because this fluid still exists and is necessary to basically keep the eye's shape, but we're looking through liquid into air.

    Apparently this contributes to the limited range of vision, and depth of field problems eyes typically have.

    Neil Degrasse Tyson explains it better than I do in his Cosmos series. Episode two if I remember correctly.
    Read the above in a Tachikoma voice.

  7. #77
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    That makes sense, enough of an explanation for me anyway.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  8. #78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgrim View Post
    It's both. From memory I think it's about 3/4 nutrition and 1/4 genetics, but it's definitely partly evolutionary. Although scientists haven't nailed down WHY: it could be as simple as sex selection, or it could be that tall genes occur alongside some other beneficial mutation.

    Under the right pressure adaptions can show noticeably within a few hundred years (ignoring really sudden stuff like the Black Plague) so there would definitely be some over ten thousand. But without being able to compare the two they may be harder to spot.
    I'm sure I read that the whole 'we're getting taller' thing was a myth?

    Though I could be confusing it with average heights only ever going up. I dunno. I can't cite any sources, because I can't remember where I read it?
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  9. #79
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cloudsdale, Equestria.
    Posts
    26,074

    Default

    I'd say based on doorways being built to allow you to pass through them, we're getting taller.

    However the process of robo-insemination is far too complex for the human mind!
    A knee high fence, my one weakness

  10. #80

    Default

    Maybe I am confusing it with average heights only ever going up.

    I know the Roman Empire considered my (possible) Pictish ancestors to be massively tall, and the graves from northern Europe around that time don't suggest they were short?
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •