BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Iceman View Post
    I'm with DarkLink. Mechanized guard is pretty tough, but when you factor in the low rear armor and their BS of 3 they are not the auto-win people say they are. Pretty much any weapon with a S8 or S9 will make short work of the armor 12 vehicles (the majority of the Guard choices since many of them are based on the Chimera hull and Valkyries/Vendettas are also 12), and that doesn't count melta weapons. Melta weapons as well as assault troops make short work of the Leman Russ variants.

    I would eliminate the God tier and put them in Great tier.

    To the original poster's question, I agree that it is tough to beat Guard for having great heavy support choices. It is kind of a brute force army wether you go with foot or mech (I have played with both and won and lost with both).
    Most mech guard tend to be vet heavy so we are talking BS4 not 3, well atleast my mech guard is vet heavy

  2. #12
    Chaplain
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Posts
    405

    Default

    I don't know why people say Orks cant handle tank bustin. We have tons of tank breaking options.

    For 150 points, you can take 10 str 8, ap 2 (or 3, dont have codex on me), Assault 1 Rokkit Launchas. Even with BS 2 you're still going to hit something each round. Put them in a 'Wagon for extra fun.

    Basic Boy Squadz become tank killers when you add in a Nob with a Klaw (12 boyz + trukk = cheap and fast tank hitting). Or for extra giggles (and points allowing) a Nob Skwad with Klaws.

    Deff Koptaz are great at tank busting too, usually hitting side armour on turn 1.

    Lootas eat light tanks, Dreads and Kans rip em in CC, and not to mention Nob bikerz!

    I've got a buddy who loves IG armour, and I stomp the tanks almost every game.

    And the Dread I have I nicknamed "Da Can Opener" - 3 close combat weapons + rokkit Launcha
    Last edited by Skragger; 03-29-2011 at 11:50 AM.
    Hi ho! Hi ho! Its off to Krump we go!

  3. #13
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sacramento area
    Posts
    9,675

    Default

    To beat mechguard, all you need to do is survive 1 round of shooting before you can get in their lines and gain fire superiority. It's true that under the right circumstances a good mechguard army can cripply nearly any other army in the game in 1-2 rounds of shooting, but that requires the right circumstances, and it absolutely requires first turn to do it reliably.

    If you get first against guard, your list should have enough long range firepower to shake at least some of his long range shooting (vendettas and artillery). Everything else charges forward, sticking to cover or blowing smoke. Survive that next round of shooting, and it's downhill from there. You're close enough to put pressure on him, and even assault him once you start blowing up chimeras, you can start getting shots in side armor, and you can use your full anti-tank firepower to shake/stun his vehicles. Stay close enough to keep the pressure up, but in a position where he can't jump all his melta/plasma vets out and kill half your army in one go, and you'll eat your way through his army one bit at a time.

    It's true this isn't necessarily easy. But mechguard is only "God tier" if they have first turn and their dice are on fire, but that's true of most any high level list. All things being equal, they're just a high level competitive list, that any other competitive list can beat.


    The trick is being aggressive. First time I played mech guard, I expected to lose (Daemonhunters aren't exactly competitive). So when I got first turn, I just rammed my army down his throat, slowing down only to machine spirit lascannons at vendettas or his artillery units. He surrendered turn 4, because he hadn't been able to kill my Land Raiders in the first turn and after that I never gave him the chance to kill them again.
    I am the Hammer. I am the right hand of my Emperor. I am the tip of His spear, I am the gauntlet about His fist. I am the woes of daemonkind. I am the Hammer.

  4. #14
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Baal
    Posts
    179

    Default

    I started playing 40K as a marine player about 12 years ago. Have went through every army except for Eldar and Daemons. And after painting, playing and then selling all the armies I am back to marines, Blood Angels but still marines. I have not found another army that can both dish out the pain and still be as resilient as Space Marines in general. So instead of looking for a new army I have decided to build pretty much an entire company. I have at least one of each unit choice in the book and the army is growing and being painted slowly. It has sated my hunger to buy another army and it gives me the flexibility to run many different army lists and have fun with what I like best.
    Your Codex is only great until the next one is released.....

  5. #15

    Default w7west

    Trick to enjoying the game of 40k and having fun with YOUR OWN army design:

    Pretend IG does not exist. Refer to all who would challenge your views as flames of war nerds.

    ... that or play dark eldar and embarrass his autowin derpderp strategy with a ****load of haywire grenades.

  6. #16
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    209

    Default

    I'd suggest something with a little different flavor. After playing the Ultramarines I would have to say go ork. Why the hell not? You already have the ultimate SOLDIER force, why not move to a WARRIOR theme? Orks are everything the Ultramarines are not. Orks are the dirty to the Utramarine's clean. Definitely a different painting style, alot muddier and bloodier. Definitely a different playing style, orks don't know what precision means!
    You scare me, wolf-brothers. You scare EVERYTHING.-Ahmad Ibn Rustah, skjald of Tra http://grayhartswarclown.blogspot.com/

  7. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eagleboy7259 View Post
    It can't necessarily be thought of that all armies have a competitive ranking (1,2,3...etc) where one is always better than other, rather there are kind of tiers of competitiveness between the armies. These exist for various reasons, the age of the codex, typical builds, army specific rules, etc. Even then certain builds can land you within different tiers, and are way more competitive than your run-of-the-mill list that goes with that army.
    i read these kind of threads and every time i wonder where people come up with their tier systems. we recently had a tournament in our area and here is the top 8 in order:

    tyranids
    chaos space marines
    orks
    deamons
    raven guard
    imperial guard
    deamonhunters (yeah that's me)
    space wolves

    as for choosing an army, my suggestion in find one that looks cool and the rules fit your style of play. good luck

  8. #18

    Default

    I have read so many people's "top lists" and almost every one of them is different in a major way from the others.

    The fact of the matter is that the book doesn't mean as much as the player. IG is NOT an auto-win, not by a long shot neither are Space Wolves nor Blood Angels as so many people seem to believe. More often than not people believe that whatever army the top players in their local area like to be the "top tier."

    Now - that being said - the newer the book the more VARIETY you can get out of it because all of its units are designed for 5th edition play. That is not to say - however - that old books aren't viable (just maybe not competitive at professional tournament level). Fod God's sake I've seen Necron beat IG and I've lost to Tyranids as Space Wolves.

    To answer OP's question, play whatever army makes sense to you. Get an idea of what playstyles are out there and whichever one seems intuitive and fun to you, play that one.
    See my blog @ http://perilsoftheblog.blogspot.com/

  9. #19
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    Really, I think all the 5th Edition books are quite balanced with each other.

    Yes, there are units here and there that are underpriced (Vendettas, Long Fangs), but they don't break anything wide open, especially against other 5th armies.

    I don't think the game is that balanced when you start looking at books from older editions, but that's what happens with this sort of thing. Still, Eldar do just fine in 5th, in my experience, and Tau and Sisters can be quite effective in the hands of skills players. I can't really speak for Orks, BT or DA as I have no experience playing against them. From what I understand, though, the Ork codex isn't that bad either. And BT and DA just got an updated FAQ that made them a lot more useful.

    Necrons are by far the worst-off (I should know, they're my first army), but you know what? They can still win against 5th armies, or at least do well. It's a -lot- harder than it ought to be, sure, but it can be done. Don't get me wrong though, Necrons are handicapped in 5th and need an update.

    It's kind of irritating seeing people whine all the time about certain armies being 'overpowered'. Take a good look at all the 5th books. They're all on pretty equal footing. This whole tier thing is kind of ridiculous.
    I've played 3 games with my vanilla Marines against the new GK book so far. Guess what? I did pretty damn well; only one game was close (I won all 3 though). Even though many people regard vanilla Marines as inferior to the shinier ones that have come out more recently.

    Now, there are armies that are more and less forgiving, for sure. Marine armies, by nature of how resilient in general Marines are, are more forgiving than, say, Tyranids. But I don't think that sets them on separate 'tiers' or makes one better or worse than the other. It means that their play styles and the tactics they need to employ are different - which is something that this game needs.

    The only time I'd say that a codex has a huge impact on how a game is going to play out is if it's -really- out of date. Necrons are really the only ones that can lay fair claim to that, currently. 4th ed. armies really don't seem that bad off. Yes there are stale, 'old-feeling' books (CSM, Sisters), but they can still do alright against the current edition's books with a capable general leading them.

    At the end of the day what it boils down to is people's list-building and tactical skills.

    Just my 2 cents.

  10. #20

    Default

    At the end of the day what it boils down to is people's list-building and tactical skills.

    This pretty much sums it up. I play Space Wolves, Vulkan Marines, Chaos Marines, Eldar and Necrons (craiglsit discount army for the win!) and I have beaten everything except Chaos Daemons an Orks (no one in our group plays them).

    Ive tabled IG armies in turn 4 with my Necrons. Last game I had the 10 tank having IG player quit in turn 4 with Logan Grimnar and 2 drop Pods full of "blow the **** out the baddest tanks standing" wolfguard/long fangs.

    Ive seen funny themed Chaos lists beat at least on paper superior Blood Angels or Eldar. I saw a Hive Tyrant roll four 1s on his saves and die in turn 1 to a trio of Scatter Laser War Walkers.

    Sometimes its a bad player. Sometimes its bad rolls. Most times, the armies stack up pretty well to each other.

    To the OP, I suggest Blood Angels, Space Wolves, or Orks. All three are different, but are good smash mouth armies. You will win some, you will lose some. In the end, as long as you have fun, who cares if you win or lose?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •