BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51
  1. #31
    Abbess Sanctorum
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,714

    Default

    Not really, but it could be fun.
    The mouth of the Emperor shall meditate wisdom; from His tongue shall speak judgment

  2. #32
    Veteran-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    land of 10k taxes
    Posts
    174

    Default

    GW needs 6th edition: Publish or Perish

    Many game companies operate this way, WotC (hasbro) most notably.

  3. #33
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Plymouth, England
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    GW does publish though

    But what its needs to publish are codexes first, rule books second
    Autarch, Shas'o, Chaos Lord and Decadant Lord of the Webway. And a Doctor!
    http://drlove42.blogspot.com/

  4. #34
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    IA, USA
    Posts
    1,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrLove42 View Post
    GW does publish though

    But what its needs to publish are codexes first, rule books second
    Agreed. Its either this or the card system that other companies use.

    GW used to include rules for models with the kit you bought, a return to that system would be a huge positive change, and enable more micro control of the game. IE fix the one or two units with out changing the whole army.
    DWs: Prussains. KoW: Elves WM: Khador WHFB: Dwarves WH40: IG, SM
    Games-workshop: changing the rules one new codex/army book at a time.

  5. #35

    Default

    Denzark, if they are called "tweaks" then they may as well call it 6th edition?

  6. #36
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    565

    Default

    Sure. I had high hopes for 5th Edition, and there's a lot of positive aspects to it, but the game is terribly stale at this point. It's a narrow, boring thing that's only seemingly balanced around tournament-esque "meta" conditions.

    I welcome a 6th that's as big an overhaul as it's rumored to be, but it'd be even better if they pulled a 3rd Edition and simply wiped the slate clean and released new Codexes for everything.

  7. #37

    Default

    Btw if you have the new codex's then straight away a new rulebook it doesn't quite make snese, as your Codex woudl be outdated again. Whyt not wait till the new edition so your codex will be updated very quickly, and will be easier to play and last longer.

  8. #38
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Plymouth, England
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Chances are the codexes written close to rule book change, given these rumours even the sisters book, are written with the new rules in mind. They suffer at the tail end of one edition, because they're mostly wirtten for the next...
    Autarch, Shas'o, Chaos Lord and Decadant Lord of the Webway. And a Doctor!
    http://drlove42.blogspot.com/

  9. #39
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Norfolk (God's County)
    Posts
    4,511

    Default

    Lexington I am surprised - the normal comment is that this is not balanced or tight enough in the slightest for tournament play unless you muddle through with some INAT FAQ that changes the main rules.
    I'M RATHER DEFINATELY SURE FEMALE SPACE MARINES DEFINERTLEY DON'T EXIST.

  10. #40
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    565

    Default

    Mm, well, "5th is very balanced" is something you hear a lot out of the competitive set - usually with qualifiers like "as long as you're using 5th Edition Codexes, or a single build from one of the older books," which strikes me as an adorable definition of the term.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •