BoLS Lounge : Wargames, Warhammer & Miniatures Forum
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 82
  1. #41

    Default

    I don't expect they'll cover fighters and bombers from BFG.

    They're described as being near the size of a jumbo jet. Which is a tad big for regular 40k.
    Fed up for Scalpers? https://www.facebook.com/groups/1710575492567307/?ref=bookmarks

  2. #42

    Default

    Yep, I remember reading something from Jervis Johnson I believe either in an interview or on the old Specialist Games forums where he described the smallest BFG craft as being around 3ft long in 40k scale. Or something around that size.
    Ask not the EldarGal a question, for she will give you three answers, all of which are puns and terrifying to know. Back off man, I'm a feminist. Ia! Ia! Gloppal Snode!

  3. #43
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Plymouth, England
    Posts
    6,729

    Default

    Isn't the Manta in BFG? That should give a idea of the scale, tiny few mm manta = 3 feet wide aircraft in 40K
    Autarch, Shas'o, Chaos Lord and Decadant Lord of the Webway. And a Doctor!
    http://drlove42.blogspot.com/

  4. #44
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Oakland, California, United States
    Posts
    3,492

    Default

    Wow? Even the fighters? I knew the bombers and assault boats would be big, but I figured the BFG fighters would be, well, flyer-sized.

    The more you know...
    ElectricPaladin Paints: http://tiny-plastic-dead.tumblr.com/
    ElectricPaladin Writes: burningzeppelinexperience.blogspot.com

  5. #45
    Brother-Captain
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ElectricPaladin View Post
    Wow? Even the fighters? I knew the bombers and assault boats would be big, but I figured the BFG fighters would be, well, flyer-sized.

    The more you know...
    Thing is that it makes more sense when designing a fighter craft for space combat that it should be larger. Larger means more engine/firepower, and you don't have to worry about the size impacting performance all that much. The larger profile also doesn't matter as much because ship-to-ship engagements or dogfights in space would take place at pretty absurd distances (there were one or two memorable space battles in Battle for the Abyss which I think were the only good parts of that book).

    I recall a conversation along these lines between my father (who's been in military and now civil aviation all his life) and an engineering friend of his. Though, granted, they were speaking in terms of a craft about the size of the Millennium Falcon, not quite as big as a Manta.
    Last edited by Kawauso; 01-14-2013 at 08:51 AM.
    Armies Played (in order of acquisition)
    Crons, SW, SM, Tau, 1k Sons, IG, Nids, BA, DE

  6. #46
    Chapter-Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Yuggoth/UK
    Posts
    3,358

    Default

    If they were to port fighters from BFG, we would of probably had the Jackal and Dirges for the necrons but instead they came up with the Night and Doom Scythes (which kept the same crescent shape). It's far more likely they'll invent new things instead.
    Please support a Poor starving musician and buy my new album for only £5 :
    https://ionplasmaincineration.bandcamp.com/album/decoding-the-quantum-star-verses

  7. #47
    Brother-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    88

    Default

    One thing to consider with Flyers shooting flyers that hasn't been mentioned here, forcing your opponent's flyer to Jink, thereby limiting its effective shooting the next round is almost as good as wrecking it. I play Tyranids, and the Mindstrike Missiles on the Stormraven is my worst nightmare when it comes to buffed up TMCs.

    Send the Flyrant after it, and roll 9 hits on it and it's probably going to Jink. Next turn...nothing but Snapshots. I think this is a mechanic that GW is trying to incorporate into these new Flyers.

  8. #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Mystery View Post
    I don't expect they'll cover fighters and bombers from BFG.

    They're described as being near the size of a jumbo jet. Which is a tad big for regular 40k.
    That used to be the case, but they cocked it up when they brought space marines into the mix by making thunderhawks their fighters/assault boats.

  9. #49
    Brother-Sergeant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorWesJanson View Post
    I don't think it is new rules, but it a battle report or series of them using those dogfighting rules and the new fliers.
    heh. Maybe they'll cram the missing dark eldar ace table in there somewhere. :P

  10. #50

    Default

    I've always taken that as a tacit admission that Thunderhawks are So Dang Awesome that they can do things other vehicles twice or three times their size can do, all at once. This is Space Marine technology. It's better than the Navy.
    Social Justice Warlord Titan

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •